« You have met "Roll Up" but have you met "Roll Down"? | Main | Blogging your Project: All Old Things Become New Again »

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Comments

Brain,

This approach changes the architecure for multi-project programs in significant ways (for the better). In 2003 you have to build a "combined" file in order to run things like Risk+ or do any Enteprise style planning in a single file. You can of course use the server as the source of data.

But the new approach lets you (I'm speculating from the marketing litertaure) to "pivot" the combined enterprise program into a new view. This is critical to aerospace programs, where the baseline enterprise program plan (ours has 8,000 or so activities and our bigger brothers have 30,000 or so activities) from an IMP/IMS architecure (Program Event based) to a WBS or IPT architecture. This takes place post-award between contract signing and Integrated Baseline Review (IBR) which is usually 9-0 days.

So now the 90 days will be replaced with a few days of rearranging the activities into seperated schedule by "selecting the activities with IPT code == Vendor, resolving the external lonks (which we've figured out how to do) and remaking a project file.

Cool, at least for us...thanks for the update.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)